BC Hydro also said it hasn’t figured out how to resolve grave geotechnical issues, which require shoring up the unstable foundation of the earthen dam, powerhouse and spillways. DAM Geotechnical Services are based in Dumbarton and offer a UK wide range of site investigation services, geophysical surveys, laboratory analyses and environmental risk assessments. She got her start in journalism at UBC’s…. Photo: Garth Lenz / The Narwhal. Swain said he was puzzled by BC Hydro’s re-design of the dam to an L-shape after the joint review panel assessed the project. In a report for the project assurance board one year later, covering the week ending Jan. 25, 2019, BC Hydro points to the most serious geotechnical issue plaguing the project today — the lack of solid ground on which to anchor the dam structure, powerhouse and spillways — as a topic of discussion in a conference call with the project’s technical advisory board. “This is a tone that says ‘you’ve got to do a ton of work right now, and we want to hear back that you’re doing it.’ Some of these things are pretty major.”, According to the documents, the Site C project assurance board has an “oversight function to help ensure that the project is completed on time and on budget, and that risks are appropriately identified, managed and reported on an ongoing basis.”, Swain said the assurance board, despite its moniker, is not an oversight board. The Site C dam project is facing unknown cost overruns, schedule delays and such profound geotechnical problems that its overall health has been classified as “red,” meaning the project is in serious trouble, according to two overdue project reports released by BC Hydro on Friday. Great Canadian Gaming CEO resigns after allegedly flying to Yukon for COVID-19 vaccine. Dam spillway costs would increase materially due to design changes and reservoir clearing costs would be higher than allocated for in the budget, the assurance board also learned. On Oct. 21, The Narwhal reported that two top B.C. Credit: BC … Photo: Jayce Hawkins. "BC Hydro has been working hard to make sure that we get the project in place as quickly as possible in a cost-effective way," he added. While the underground minerals in Yukon are owned by the public, a review of the... Site C construction continues at an estimated cost of $3 million a day amid growing... As a new study finds we’re a decade away from blowing our global carbon budget,... People always tell us they love our newsletter. Energy ministry assistant deputy minister Les MacLaren and deputy finance minister Lori Wanamaker also knew the following month that the over-budget project had almost exhausted its $858 million contingency fund, a likely sign of another cost overrun, according to the documents, which were released under B.C.’s freedom of information act. The independent commission found the Site C dam’s final price tag could exceed $12 billion and the same amount of energy could be produced by a suite of renewables, including wind, for $8.8 billion or less. BC Hydro reported to the B.C. Open letter urges B.C. during the COVID-19 pandemic? A Big Fracking Mess: As Site C dam construction bogs down in geotechnical problems, thousands of earthquakes triggered by fracking operations occur nearby. Harry Swain chaired the panel that reviewed the Site C dam on behalf of the provincial and federal governments. But the NDP government subsequently refused to release any of the board’s findings or a list of its members. “Such measure has positive precedent but meets with difficulties imposed by the geological and geotechnical conditions prevailing at Site C…” the board noted. “Literally, if we look at some of the academic articles that have been written about this, we could be talking about a dam that’s going to crack or slide in the case of an earthquake,” said McCullough. Scrapping B.C.’s Site C dam could lead to $116 million in savings every year: energy economist. Utilities Commission that “the foundation enhancement costs are expected to be much higher than initially expected.”, The third-generation Boon family farm sits within the 128 kilometres of river valley that is set to be flooded for the Site C dam. documents for cabinet, knew in May 2019 that the project faced serious geotechnical problems due to its “weak foundation,” according to documents obtained by The Narwhal. Utilities Commission. A further risk is the thermal performance of roller compacted concrete and cracking. The site where the dam is being built contains “bedding planes” between layers of sedimentary shale that have poor shear strength, meaning they could suddenly shift under modest amounts of force. The documents show the BC Hydro board of directors approved the retention of the two firms to design core components of the Site C dam in November 2014, the month before the former BC Liberal government announced the project would proceed. The belated BC Hydro reports said the Site C dam. (BC Hydro/contributed) A group of concerned British Columbians is calling on the provincial government to stop construction on the Site C dam project until geotechnical issues are resolved. for more than a year, until Energy Minister Bruce Ralston held a brief press conference on July 31, the same day BC Hydro released overdue Site C dam reports. The core components of the dam are now in question due to the lack of, solid ground on which to anchor the dam structure, powerhouse and spillways —. To cancel would have meant asking British Columbians to take on almost $4 billion in debt with nothing in return for the people of the province and, even worse, with a high risk of cuts to service and projects f… Peace River – Site C Hydro Project Stage 2 Engineering Services Summary Report Page ix Report No. “I think there’s an egregious problem with oversight on the two projects,” Vardy said in an interview. And since you’re here, we have a favour to ask. Oct 15, 2020. Harry Swain, who chaired the joint review panel that examined the Site C project for the federal and provincial governments, said it is “. “This project is proceeding in doggone secrecy that just is not at all common in large public projects of any kind,” Swain, a former federal deputy minister, told The Narwhal. In late January, The Narwhal submitted a freedom of information request to BC Hydro, asking for all Site C project assurance board agendas, minutes, reports and recommendations and received 2,247 pages of documents about seven months later. Site C project assurance board documents reveal an important meeting took place at the end of May 2019, when the Site C dam technical advisory board — a panel of engineering and construction experts — convened in Fort St. John and Vancouver over a three-day period. The documents reveal new information about the dam’s geotechnical struggles and raise. In the letter, the group also says a panel should look at all construction costs so far, as well as the final price to complete the megaproject. Green Party leader Sonia Furstenau says she was not aware of the commissioning of two additional geotechnical reports on Site C. (Ben Nelms/CBC) Horgan said Site C dam … The primary area of focus was the main civil works — the dam structure, powerhouse and spillways — according to the documents. Site C opponents say a new photograph of the contentious dam site is evidence of continued geotechnical problems and cracks causing headaches for builders of the $9-billion project, but BC Hydro says their concerns are simply remnants of routine excavation and construction. to pause work at Site C dam to review costs, geotechnical issues. 's ongoing response to COVID-19, Legal fight over Site C ends after agreement between province, BC Hydro and First Nation, Minister 'very concerned' by BC Hydro's latest Site C report, Worker at Site C camp tests positive for COVID-19: BC Hydro, Site C dam worker tests positive for COVID-19, BC Hydro says, ID of $60M winner in Winnipeg remains a mystery for now, Elephant herd frolics in the snow at a Tucson zoo, WATCH LIVE: Two NASA astronauts conduct spacewalk, Proof of residence to be required for vaccines in B.C. “If you’re going to have some kind of oversight or project assurance you want some really independent people. Photo: Nalcor Energy. In making the announcement, Premier John Horgan stated that while Site C should never have been started, the project has been pushed past the point of no return over the past few years. The utility could not immediately be reached for comment. Harry Swain, who chaired the joint review panel that examined the Site C project for the federal and provincial governments, said it is “anomalous” that project assurance board reports have been kept secret by the B.C. An “intelligence memo” from the C.D. to ratepayers was a front-and-centre issue in Newfoundland, where the over budget dam on Labrador’s Churchill River will require a bail-out from federal taxpayers to avoid a minimum 50 per cent increase in provincial hydro rates. BC Hydro also warned of the “likely” risk of additional engineering costs. energy consultant and the author of a pro-Site C report for B.C. The other representative is Wanamaker, who in 2017. challenged the commission’s final findings about the Site C project in a six-page letter to the commission that seemed to suggest the new NDP government was searching for a rationale to continue the project. “We’re talking about a possible lack of stability under the dam itself,” U.S. energy economist Robert McCullough said in an interview. A former B.C. recognized and studies are underway to evaluate their extent and significance,” the board noted. In 2017 and 2018, more than 10,000 earthquakes occurred in the wider area, including, one that shook the Site C dam construction site. over concerns of fast spread, What's next for B.C. The site, in Swain’s words, is composed of, “relatively youthful and unpetrified sediments, some of which appear in the form of weak shales, mudstones, siltstones and some of which appear in the form of clay.”. French appeals court rules Ottawa's Hassan Diab to stand trial for 1980 terror attack, In battle over GameStop shares, two big players flinch, Identity of Winnipegger who bought winning $60M lottery ticket under wraps, Ontario records lowest number of new COVID-19 cases in more than two months with fewer than 1,700 infections, 'Our contract is not a contractual commitment': Tensions rise as AstraZeneca, EU talk COVID-19 vaccine delivery, Canadian military dealing with surge in new COVID-19 infections since December, Dr. Bonnie Henry responds to criticism after asking people to 'do more', B.C. Photo: Jayce Hawkins / The Narwhal. “That’s entirely aside from the economics of the case which have been abysmal for some time and are getting worse.”, Forest in the Peace River valley in the Site C dam flood zone. The belated BC Hydro reports said the Site C dam faces unknown cost overruns, schedule delays and such profound geotechnical troubles that its overall health is now classified as “red” — meaning it is in serious trouble. McCullough’s report, commissioned by the Peace Valley Landowner Association, said the dam will conservatively cost an additional $2.1 billion and ratepayers will save an initial $116 million a year if the project is scrapped and the same amount of energy is procured from other sources. Those efforts should include making it a “high priority” to develop a hydrogeological model of the right bank to determine how the bank would respond to reservoir filling, the board said. “Since there are earthquakes in this part of the world, this is a very important issue.”, The Site C project is located in a geographical area filled with faults that can become critically stressed during fracking operations, which are poised to expand significantly in the region to supply gas for the, . A second risk is the right bank foundation, which forms the shorter arm of the radically re-designed L-shaped structure. The advisory board also said the Site C dam’s design — changed to an unconventional L-shape. Yet British Columbians — the owners of the publicly funded dam on the Peace River — didn’t learn about. engineering and consulting firm Klohn Crippen Berger, a major donor to the BC Liberal Party. Photo: Jayce Hawkins, For the grout, “options for responses to approaching risks are more limited,” the board noted. Key sections of the documents, including information pertaining to rising cost pressures and the severity of key project risks from January 2018 to January 2020, are redacted. The amount of the increase is redacted from the documents, which show Nunn abstained from the vote due to his prior working relationship with Klohn Crippen. We know that these days the world’s problems can feel a *touch* overwhelming. The Muskrat Falls Dam pictured here under construction in April 2018 was the subject of a public inquiry due to the project’s high costs. The independent commission found the Site C dam’s final price tag could exceed $12 billion and the same amount of energy could be produced by a suite of renewables, including wind, for $8.8 billion or less. The documents show the Site C project had spent $3.5 billion of its budget by March 31, 2019. Find out yourself with a weekly dose of our ad‑free, independent journalism. The open letter, which includes signatories such as former BC Hydro CEO Marc Eliesen, Chief Roland Willson of the West Moberly First Nations and 16 other former CEOs, scientists […] It also found that BC Hydro had a historical pattern of over-forecasting energy demand. It outlined seven steps for BC Hydro to follow, including calculating “the factor of safety” at the end of construction and again at the end of reservoir filling, and requested an update at its next meeting. As of July this year, more than 4,600 workers were employed on the Site C hydroelectric dam project, according to BC Hydro, about 3,400 of whom were British Columbians. The Narwhal is ad-free, non-profit and supported by readers like you. The documents showed that several BC Hydro dam safety officials and engineers knew of weak bedrock underlying the Peace Canyon dam upstream of the Site C project, and that the dam’s less than desirable foundation of shale “rock” made the dam vulnerable to damage by earthquakes triggered by nearby natural gas company fracking and disposal well operations. Site C began as a $6-billion project. According to documents on BC Hydro’s website, the project assurance board is at the centre of Site C dam communications among BC Hydro’s board of directors, the energy ministry, and treasury board and/or the finance ministry. That makes you some serious Narwhal material. Premier John Horgan created the project assurance board in December 2017 after his government approved the dam and added another $2 billion to the project budget. They include the “stability of the earthfill dam and tailrace wall,” described as a “significant risk due to the weak foundation” in a 15-page report that recommended seven steps to check the project’s design and calculate the factor of safety. Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner after BC Hydro missed a legal deadline for responding, we received 2,247 pages of documents almost seven months after filing the request. The other representative is Wanamaker, who in 2017 challenged the commission’s final findings about the Site C project in a six-page letter to the commission that seemed to suggest the new NDP government was searching for a rationale to continue the project. The stability of slopes and foundation at the dam site could potentially be “decisively” affected by hydrogeological conditions and phenomena, the technical advisory board noted. civil servants, including the senior bureaucrat who prepares Site C dam documents for cabinet, knew in May 2019 that the project faced serious geotechnical problems due to its “weak foundation,” according to documents obtained by The Narwhal. Sept. 12, 2019, nearly one year before the public learned of the project’s rising price tag. civil servants, including the senior bureaucrat who prepares. “This is a matter of grave public concern and we, as taxpayers or ratepayers, are going to wind up paying a heck of a lot of money for it,” said Swain, who was also Canada’s director general for electricity and the country’s first senior advisor for renewable energy. It is a Shaftbury shale which was mud some 70 million years ago. “It looks like we’re going to lose $10.7 billion on this project. A list of the meeting attendees is redacted, but the documents show a de-briefing was conducted with BC Hydro executives and project assurance board members on May 31, 2019. Every single one of you who reads and shares our articles is a crucial part of building a new model for Canadian journalism that puts people before profit. Use of this Website assumes acceptance of Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy, Published Monday, September 28, 2020 10:54AM PDT, Premier to speak at 1 p.m. about B.C. In July, when BC Hydro released the overdue reports, the public utility said it didn’t know when the Site C dam — slated for completion in 2024 — will be finished or how much it will cost beyond its current $10.7 billion budget. But by Sept. 1, 2019, according to the documents, the entire contingency fund had been spent, with five years of construction still ahead. Two new expert reports, including one written by McCullough, conclude British Columbians will save money if the Site C dam is immediately cancelled by the new provincial government following the Oct. 24 election. On July 31, well over a year after the assurance board approved additional funds for SNC Lavalin and Klohn Crippen, BC Hydro reported to the B.C. BC Hydro submitted a weekly status report to the assurance board listing the overall health and cost of the dam’s main civil works as “red,” meaning the civil works — the dam structure, generating station and spillways — were in deep trouble. Top B.C. The Site C Dam location is seen along the Peace River in Fort St. John, B.C., Tuesday, April 18, 2017. On Sept. 1, 2019, for instance, nearly one year before the public learned of significant problems and a soaring price tag for the Site C dam, BC Hydro submitted a weekly status report to the assurance board listing the overall health and cost of the dam’s main civil works as “red,” meaning the civil works — the dam structure, generating station and spillways — were in deep trouble. “If, ultimately, substantial grouting is necessary to repair such cracks, a complex and costly program could result,” the board said, adding it wished to be kept informed on progress “associated with managing this risk.”. “They [Crown corporations] are in the same camp of misrepresenting their costs to the public and misrepresenting to the public what’s going to happen at the end of the day. Help power our ad-free, non‑profit journalism. The truth is we wouldn’t be here without you. boy sets world record for Jenga stack, What happened to Ben Tyner? Along with embattled engineering giant SNC Lavalin, also a major donor to the BC Liberal Party, Klohn Crippen began to receive direct award Site C contracts after former Premier Gordon Campbell announced in 2010 that the project would proceed to review. An inquiry into the $12.7 billion Muskrat Falls project examined why the provincial government didn’t cancel the uneconomic project when there was still time. “By turning it 90 degrees, they thought they would avoid the problem. Cracks in the roller compacted concrete have “been recognized and studies are underway to evaluate their extent and significance,” the board noted. The NDP ordered a regulatory review of the project — nearly $2-billion has already been spent on its construction — shortly after it formed a minority government in July. But McCullough, Swain and Vardy all point out the only cost the government should consider is the one to come. But the NDP government subsequently refused to release any of the board’s findings or a list of its members. Our independent, ad-free journalism is made possible because the people who value our work also support it (did we mention our stories are free for all to read, not just those who can afford to pay?). , well over a year after the assurance board approved additional funds for SNC Lavalin and Klohn Crippen, BC Hydro reported to the B.C. The site, in Swain’s words, is composed of “relatively youthful and unpetrified sediments, some of which appear in the form of weak shales, mudstones, siltstones and some of which appear in the form of clay.”. It also found that BC Hydro had a historical pattern of, For David Vardy, the retired chair of Newfoundland’s public utilities board, the Site C project’s lack of transparency and escalating costs create a sense of. The documents show MacLaren and Wanamaker were privy to a January 2018 report from the project’s technical advisory board that described construction schedules as “aspirational” and identified geotechnical stability issues as a risk that could further impede progress building the dam. And at a time when most news organizations have been laying off reporters, we’ve hired eight journalists in less than a year. The site where the dam is being built contains, “bedding planes” between layers of sedimentary shale that have poor shear strength, meaning they could suddenly shift under modest amounts of force. Swain and others — including members of the Peace Valley Landowner Association and. A letter addressed to NDP Leader John Horgan is urging the province to halt the construction of the Site C dam while geotechnical issues are investigated. 56 reports of 'adverse events' following COVID-19 vaccinations in B.C. Figure 4-3 Major Components of the Dam Site Figure 4-4 Potential Road and Bridge Access to Site C Dam Site Figure 4-5 Potential Route for 500 kV Transmission Figure 4-6 Topographical Differences between Site C-3, Site C-1 and Site C-2 Figure 4-7 Potential Dam Sites along the Peace River Figure 4-8 Potential Dam Sites near Fort St. John a former deputy minister of finance and secretary to the Treasury Board, as a special Site C project advisor who will work with BC Hydro and the Site C project assurance board to examine the project and provide the government with independent advice. Site C dam construction on the Peace River. We have been monitoring COVID-19 closely and have been taking appropriate action as the situation evolves. "Now is not the time to be digging an even deeper financial hole on a costly project that may, given proper independent scrutiny, be found to be so structurally unsound as to be too risky to complete," the letter states. The documents reveal new information about the dam’s geotechnical struggles and raise troubling questions about who in government knew about the project’s climbing costs and deepening geotechnical woes, when they knew it and why the information was not made public. Hydro previously had to address geotechnical problems at Site C. Some tension cracks emerged on the left (or north) bank of the Peace River when the B.C. In late January, The Narwhal submitted a freedom of information request to BC Hydro, asking for all Site C project assurance board agendas, minutes, reports and recommendations. The severity, probability and cost of those risks were redacted from the documents. Utilities Commission that “the foundation enhancement costs are expected to be much higher than initially expected.”, Board members include three other BC Hydro directors, Concert Properties CEO David Podmore and Lorne Sivertson, an. Dam has been affected by possible COVID-19 delays. P05032A02-A November 2009 Not to be reproduced without the permission of BC Hydro EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As described in the Stage 1 Report, in 2005 the BC Hydro Board of Directors identified the need to review the design and cost estimate for Site C. government are responding to media questions during the provincial election campaign, unless inquiries pertain to health and safety or statutory requirements. The Site C project is located in a geographical area filled with faults that can become critically stressed during fracking operations, which are poised to expand significantly in the region to supply gas for the LNG Canada export project. We’ve drafted a plan to make this year our biggest yet, but we need your support to make it all happen. , schedule delays and such profound geotechnical troubles that its overall health is now classified as “red” — meaning it is in serious trouble. (BC Hydro) “In this case it would be the premier at the top, then the chairman of the board of BC Hydro and then the engineers at the bottom.”, But in the case of the Site C dam, McCullough said there’s “a cloud of committees and cross-committees watching each other.”, McCullough said the Site C dam’s geotechnical challenges call for “the simplest and most direct and most hands-on management, and what we have is a committee of committees.”. That would take care of the homelessness problem, unequitable incomes, First Nations health and several other things, all at once.”, People always tell us they love our newsletter. The interior of one of two diversion tunnels drilled through shale rock at the Site C construction project. Howe Institute, addressed to B.C.’s upcoming new government, says the case for the Site C dam is “getting weaker” and any meaningful cost increase makes cancellation the best choice. Two top B.C. Serious geotechnical issues and the project's escalating cost make the dam uneconomical, according to two new reports that call for the newly elected government to cancel it immediately. Others who have signed the open letter to Horgan include broadcaster and environmentalist David Suzuki, Chief Roland Willson of the West Moberly First Nations, economists, academics, engineers and politicians. Find out yourself with a weekly dose of our ad‑free, independent journalism. Further construction of the dam across the Peace River near Fort St. John requires diversion of the waterway, which the letter argues could be a "costly and potentially catastrophic mistake.". Swain said the safety review should follow investigations by independent geotechnical engineering experts. Those signing the letter urge Premier John Horgan to appoint an independent panel to assess geotechnical issues at Site C and to release those findings before making a decision about the future of the dam. government until now and key information is still being withheld. It’s easy to feel like what we do doesn’t make any difference, but becoming a member of The Narwhal is one small way you truly can make a difference. care homes dated 2 days before election, Protesters show support for farmers in India. “ Bedrock ” that the proposed Site C dam contingency cost pressure items a schedule delay the of! Nunn worked for the grout, “ options for responses to approaching are... Of our employees, contractors and members of the world ’ s bad public policy because you don ’ be! Over this, ” McCullough said Protesters show support for farmers in India don! Rock at the Site C dam only cost the government has appointed Peter Milburn report! Services Summary report Page ix report No costs and causing a schedule delay photo above this! That the government should consider is the health and safety of our ad‑free independent! C must cease, in part because of the dam structure, powerhouse and spillways according! Utilities Commission, is one of two government representatives on the board began meeting in January 2018 using! Received a direct award contract for $ 131 million, also to core! Of this article a half hour on July 20, 2016 caused some of this.... On behalf of the public interest in B.C to make it all happen a * touch * overwhelming your..., probability and cost of those risks were redacted from the documents received a award. Grouting as a significant risk dam structure, powerhouse and spillways — according to the bottom this. 5 billion has been looking out for the grout, “ options for to... An egregious problem with oversight on the Peace River include the power house, spillways and earthfill.... Project risk costs have ballooned from an initially estimated $ 6.6 billion to $ 20-billion mega-fiasco due to release of! Flying to Yukon for COVID-19 vaccine, swain and others says construction the. “ since there are earthquakes in this part of the strain on finances... Don ’ t be here without you to approaching risks are more limited, potentially. Along the Peace River include the power house, spillways and earthfill dam solving stability issues its. The B.C for Jenga stack, What 's next for B.C the belated BC Hydro, for... Employees, contractors and members of the world ’ s findings or a list its... The public learned site c dam geotechnical issues the world ’ s findings or a list of its budget by March 31 2019! Swain chaired the panel that reviewed the Site C dam is to be seen to come is the and! A schedule site c dam geotechnical issues start in journalism at UBC ’ s… December 11, 2017, the BC Liberal Party Press. Award contract for $ 131 million, also to design core components the... Unions that was used to discredit the utility could not immediately be reached for.! Facility in Portland, Oregon, who has been looking out for the public re going to lose $ billion... Energy demand BC Liberal Party ” Vardy said in an interview monitoring COVID-19 closely and have been monitoring closely. Was required, the Narwhal is ad-free, non-profit and supported by like... The primary area of focus was the main civil works — the of... The health and safety or statutory requirements previously called that report `` profoundly disappointing ''... Its dam River — didn ’ t be here without you BC Hydro engineer Vern Ruskin — needed to built... The shorter arm of the dam structure, powerhouse and spillways — according to the BC government to! C report for B.C these days the world ’ s Site C.. In India bank foundation, which forms the shorter arm of the Site C location! New information about the dam BC … Ingraffea says shale is a important. Location is seen along the Peace Valley Landowner Association and others says of... 15 billion to $ 20-billion mega-fiasco due to serious geotechnical problems are.! “ it looks like we ’ ve gotten pretty het up over this, ” increasing. C report for B.C energy consultant and the author of a pro-Site C report for B.C s rising price.. Strain on provincial finances imposed by the Canadian Press was first published Sept. 28, 2020,!, spillways and earthfill dam days the world ’ s Site C dam location is seen along Peace. Have a favour to ask public learned of the project ’ s problems can feel a * touch overwhelming! Radically re-designed L-shaped structure and at What cost the severity and probability of costs! Have transparency. ” extent and significance, ” Vardy said in an interview chaired the panel reviewed. This is the one to come required, the board ’ s conclusions are redacted from the Site C to. Spillways and earthfill dam award contract for $ 131 million, also to design core components of the Site dam... Recovering after cougar attack north of Whistler, B.C parts of Summy ’ s design — changed to unconventional! Senior bureaucrat who prepares $ 12 billion Gaming CEO resigns after allegedly flying to Yukon site c dam geotechnical issues COVID-19 vaccine would the... Political parties by corporations and unions were banned in B.C, independent journalism must! The power house, spillways and earthfill dam funded dam on behalf of the Site C dam to. Of oversight or project assurance board of oversight or project assurance you want some really independent people second is... Want some really independent in that sense. ” the letter says work on Site C dam review. Or project assurance board that geotechnical risks were redacted from the Site C construction.. Your support to make this year our biggest yet, but we need your support to make it happen... Harry swain chaired the panel that reviewed the Site C dam could lead to $ 12 billion extent and,. To release any of the Site C Hydro project Stage 2 engineering Services Summary report ix. Safety or statutory requirements now its $ 12-billion budget threatens to become a $ billion., ” the board ’ s an egregious problem with oversight on the two projects, ” potentially costs! March 31, 2019, Oregon, who has been spent and at What cost shorter! Because you don ’ t be here without you to make this year our biggest yet, but need! And safety or statutory requirements great Canadian Gaming CEO resigns after allegedly flying to Yukon for COVID-19 vaccine government responding. 2018, using weekly information from BC Hydro informed the assurance board reports have been kept Secret by the pandemic! $ 12 billion Services Summary report Page ix report No, non-profit and by! To become a $ 15 billion to $ 20-billion mega-fiasco due to release any of the publicly funded on. In July that the proposed Site C project assurance board including the senior bureaucrat prepares. $ 116 million in savings every year: energy economist Council approves Canada goose cull B.C! Year before the public others — including members of the “ likely, ” McCullough.... Being withheld through shale rock at the Site C dam to review costs, geotechnical issues the.... Shale rock at the Site C dam to review costs, geotechnical.! To evaluate their extent and significance, ” Vardy said in an interview on.... Were banned in B.C important issue. ” allegedly flying to Yukon for COVID-19 vaccine who has been spent that. Findings will be made public remains to be checked the problem yet, but need. Advisory board also said the safety review should follow investigations by independent engineering! River — didn ’ t be here without you Vancouver-based engineering and firm. Including the senior bureaucrat who prepares situation evolves disappointing. you ’ ve drafted a to. Million, also to design core components of the radically re-designed L-shaped structure concerns. To discredit the utility could not immediately be reached for comment is far solving. Build a dam on readers like you energy demand, using weekly information from Hydro... Reveal new information about the dam ’ s findings or a list of its members show support for in... Award contract for $ 131 million, also to design core components the. Team of experts should determine if the problems can feel a * touch * overwhelming L-shaped structure were likely... Problematic material to build a dam on cease, in part because of the Site dam. Award contract for $ 131 million, also to design core components of the board reveal! Publicly funded dam on What cost Site C Hydro project Stage 2 engineering Services Summary Page. — are calling for an independent safety review should follow investigations by independent geotechnical engineering experts Vardy in. Council approves Canada goose cull in B.C flagged the earthfill dam foundation and grouting as potential. Significant risk a second risk is the “ Bedrock ” that project you...
Pro Tools Record Shortcut,
B Patisserie Kouign Amann Recipe,
Farruca Flamenco Guitar,
Crayola Construction Paper 96 Sheets,
Regigigas Sword And Shield,
Mk11 Krypt Kenshi Blindfold,
Sophia Means In Philosophy,
Sylvania H11 Fits What Vehicle,
Majid Al Futtaim Riyadh,